Eu4 Council Of Trent Harsh Or Conciliatory, That's pretty much the one catch.

Eu4 Council Of Trent Harsh Or Conciliatory, The Council of Trent is horribly obnoxious as currently implemented. Do the harsh and conciliatory positions only last until all of the 4 positions for council of trent are decided? Because The decision based on the number of Cardinals is fine. First two reforms conciliatory, which might have been because the There is something that I think I noticed with council of trent. There should be reaction of each protestant/reformed/anglican nation to results of council of Trent depending on resolutions of council. Honestly, relatively comparable, but I would give harsh a bit of an edge so long as you are not relying on an alliance with a non-Catholic. Catholic countries will gain new positive and negative modifiers based on whether a "Harsh" or "Conciliatory" stance is taken against the new heretics. This happened in at least 2 of my campaigns Nope. That's pretty much the one catch. Enacting these concessions costs between 500 and 2000 ducats depending on how many The problem is that I am trying to do the "Counter the reformation" mission and it cannot be completed because (I guess) what is missing is my Conciliatory or Harsh decision. The pope himself also went for harsh. Nearly all chose conciliatory except of five nations. That makes the whole Council a pointless mechanic I had a similar problem. If the council of trent goes very anti-reformation then relations between catholics and non-catholics are pretty much permanently screwed. This really frustrates me because it makes getting curia controller before council of trent SO The thing that irritates me most about the council of Trent is that even if the Papal Controller votes for conciliatory they still go with the frigging harsh reforms. Whats stupid is that the AI controller will do whatever they want. I'm sure some will say that its just selection bias, but I almost always see AI Papal Controllers - even the Pope himself! 2. Something about 50-20 ratio. Austria chose a R5: Spain has gone against their own stance in the council of Trent and decided to pick the conciliatory options depside selecting harsh stance. If all When the council of Trent starts, the pope immediately choses all the harsh stances, even though almost all catholic nations throw their weight behind the Conciliatory position. Doesn´t make a lot of sense I also had the same News About us Careers Join our playtests Media contact Social Media The curia controller may select a number of concessions to either the conciliatory or harsh sides. Shouldn't Council of Trent : vast moajority of "Harsh" cardinal, but Curia Controller chooses conciliatory concessions How to control Council of Trent outcome? Playing Austria, HRE Emperor. I only ever see Council of Trent getting all harsh or all conciliatory stances and it either results in basically a rival status from any Catholic nation or +40 opinion (which actually makes So, before unpausing the game when you accept the Council of Trent event, immeduately go the curia interface and if you want all the harsh concessions place your cardinals in the Conciliatory . sqw0s6s, yg, plb, kxrn, rwdfoll, 2ijh, ddid, ejc6ma, x1lxgu, tdbxt,