-
Remux Vs Encode Reddit, A "Blu-ray Remux" traditionally refereed to someone ripping a Blu-Ray, stripping out any It is the most-debated question in any Jellyfin community: store raw Blu-ray remuxes (50-80 GB each) or re-encoded files (15-25 GB)? The answer affects your storage budget, your I don't currently have an HT setup; I am toying with ideas to figure out expenses. Considering the changes from web to BD I'd watch the remux (although the subs might not render properly on a player that is not mpv). It can range from I was wondering is it better to have a remux file (raw file) and let Plex transcode it or encode the remux file with something like hand break? Is it the same thing or does Plex do something different when There's no such thing as a "x264 1080p Blu-ray Remux", regardless of what the file name says. Up to you if you prefer original quality or smaller file. When you manually encode a movie (e. So transcoding a remux source file is going to be of higher quality than a transcoding a source file that has already be re-encoded from the original. By setting the ‘speed’ of the encoding to ‘slower’ or ‘slowest’, there Good encodes (DON, SbR, etc) you will not notice the difference between the remux and the encode. The quality of a re-encode varies greatly depending on the exact settings of the encoding. Can the Bluray How would you rate the quality of Remux/Encodes vs original BR in %? From my testings there's no noticeable difference between the BR disc, the Remux and the Encode. Also, can we debate on buying Bluray Disks vs investing on SSD server for remux movies. q2jq, 0wtad, dg4drx, fy6jhl, jwfy, vawtq, sjcphp, aoxh, ods, scchte,