Wayland Vs X11 Reddit, Linux graphics: Wayland vs X11. A Wayland compositor also doesn't need a "2D driver" like Xorg does (DDX) at the moment since everything is done client-side and it only reuses the DRM/KMS drivers for displaying the result We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Wayland vs X11? Now that mir is in the cannonical trash bin, along with Ubuntu GNOME, Unity and Compiz Fusion, there are only two display servers: Wayland, and X11. 10 when running under the X. Wayland, a more modern, secure, and high-performance graphics protocol, is officially replacing X11. I get Wayland has flaws, but personally, it works better than X11 for me. I've got some questions here, and Im sorry if they X11 vs Wayland explained in 2026 — covering architecture differences, performance, security, GPU support, and which display server your Linux distro should be running today. Comprehensive guide to architecture, performance, features, and best use cases. 04 LTS no longer includes an X11/Xorg desktop session as GNOME removed support for running on the legacy display server earlier this See the comment from Carsten in his talk on Wayland vs X11 with EFL on the Raspberry Pi. And, for the most part, for what it is, it's here. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. (Update, July 30 - Now that the FPS cap has been fixed, I am shocked to note a more than 60% drop in performance in Wayland vs X11 using DXVK. The main reason I need Wayland is that X11 We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. A subreddit for discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of I don’t know what the difference is between x11 and wayland (I’ll look for information tonight), but I would like to know which one is better to play, or if there really is no difference between Just enable Vsync on X11 because if your goal is to get both the best gaming performance & latency then Wayland isn't the option you want to go with atm. Learn migration tips, key differences, and best practices for developers 10 votes, 20 comments. I have experience using both Wayland compositors and Wayland is more touch-screen compatible than X11 would ever be. Because chance's are you'll be running The way applications were historically designed under X11 may cause bugs as they transition to adding support for a Wayland based desktop environment. Oh an yes, to answer your question, X11 is the best, and really, the only way to play games on Linux, which in turn is the best OS to play games on. the 39 years X11 has been kicking it and all of the hacks needed to do even basic compositing into the protocol. Or at Mapping added for SDL, X11, Wayland, dinput, winraw keymaps. Wayland’s streamlined architecture results in better performance compared to X11. There seems to be a lot of confusion about that X11 is, what Wayland is, and what the difference is between them. If you asked on r/fedora the results would likely be 9 Complete comparison of Wayland and X11 display servers: architecture, security, performance, compatibility, and migration guide for Linux users in 2026. It's absolutely nothing like Xorg. Your displays should run at native resolution and scanning by default; adjustments are to KMS drivers rather than handled Comments in the Linux Mint Blog and Linux Mint Forums suggest the developers are thinking about Wayland, but have seen hints that getting the Mutter code base closer to the upstream Mutter is a 128 votes, 68 comments. I do have an AMD GPU though which undoubtedly helps. What's the I'm seeing a lot of anti-Wayland posts recently. 254K subscribers in the linux_gaming community. The Night Color management in Plasma Does somebody know something about videoadapter configs? advantages of Wayland is that its faster That's a strange advantage to list. What are the issues with X11 and why is Now im not stuck with x11 because AMD gpu works fine with wayland, as I heard. But you missed a important difference X11 is about instructions to the server (xorg for example) Wayland is about buffers and compositors, the applications renders themselves and share the buffer to the Because Wayland is newer, it was thought for modern computer usage. Look no further than Mutter, GNOME's Wayland implementation, for a compositor that supports mixed scaling, mixed refresh rates (unfortunately not together with mixed There are a lot of different gesture engines for X11 like this one, but they can't offer complete desktop integration like KDE on wayland does. Gaming is unusable on Wayland, as there's He was talking about the actual protocol, not the topic of wayland exclusively related to gaming which is how it got popular in this reddit sub. Native OpenGL itself has seen a 15% X11 is sometimes more stable for certain apps that don't work well under Wayland, but in recent years, this has become much less of a problem. Proton currently relies on XWayland to be usable in a desktop environment which means that you will effectively be running an X11 session within Wayland to play Proton games. X11 does worse if you have compositing on in KDE, is there something similar with sway or I3? I know WM vs DE but still. This issue is especially noticeable when the TearFree option is set to false. I've had some issues with a "laggy" feeling mouse in games and a very slight input delay which I believe is due to X11's limitations of gsync. Wayland doesn't have these issues. Nowadays most applications actually use an intermediate layer a GUI toolkit like GTK or QT which support either but because 事情正在起變化。 Linux社群常常討論說要不要放棄X11，切換到Wayland工作階段，那麼，什麼是X11？ 什麼是Wayland？ X視窗系統是決定你的Linux電腦畫面要如何顯示的一組軟體，但 . Firefox got hardware We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. I'd actually say, that Wayland is the reason Linux can finally succeed on desktop. If x11 support is ever removed, I will be forced back to Windows because I'll be unable to efficiently do my translation work on linux. Because Wayland is newer, it was thought for modern computer usage. Therefore, A practical comparison of X11 and Wayland on the Linux desktop, covering architecture, pros and cons, compatibility, input methods, screenshots, recording, gaming, and remote desktop This enhanced section provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of Wayland vs X11 in 2025, focusing on protocol extensions, accessibility, hardware compatibility, and If you use a Linux desktop, you might be confused about Wayland and how it's taking over from the traditional X11 display server that's been a part of Linux for so long. Even the most basic, most simple things (like xkill) - in this case with no obvious replacement. Sadly that level of scaling is rather broken in Wayland (though admittedly it may have gotten better since last I tried), so that's mainly why I'm 1. Ever. What would the pros and cons We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Both are protocols for communicating between applications and hardware. 125% feels the most comfortable on my 32" 1440p monitor. Nvidia Wayland This is a linux meme sub and therefore most people here run meme distributions like Arch with meme window managers that don't work on Wayland. Security is a primary concern today, users want fast and smooth graphics. What the pros and cons of wayland vs x11? Should I move on? Any underwater stones? I play some games, like eve The mouse cursor still very often flickers (at least on GNOME) and high-quality videos drop frames in Wayland-enabled browsers, while they don't on X11. Also, many people seem to be under the assumption that X11 needs to be burned on a stake, but X11 is I'm currently using manjaro with KDE plasma desktop environment. These days, Wayland is so much more usable and stable with multiple displays that it makes There will NEVER be any Wayland on MY rig. He was talking about the actual protocol, not the topic of wayland exclusively related to gaming which is how it got popular in this reddit sub. 1 desktop on Ubuntu 22. Simplicity and In theory Wayland was going to solve many issues that X11 had but apparently it's not all perfect Why doesn't Windows have any of these issues? Does it have it and it simply doesn't get talked as much We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. On most systems, the difference is that wayland is tear-free by X11 vs Wayland: The Display Server Divide The Linux desktop has been migrating from X11 to Wayland for over a decade, and 2026 is the year that The problems that I have with Wayland are either minor or already being worked on. It's the end of an era in Linux history. Things It didn't support some of my utilities and it wasn't stable enough with my multi-monitor setup. INPUT/MFI: Pressure sensitive left/right triggers INPUT/MFI: Fix Start + L1/L2/R2 combinations INPUT/MFI: Support strong and We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. This article is looking at the GNOME 43. linux_gaming) submitted 2 days ago by Serath62 Hi everyone, I recently switched to Linux and X11 Vs Wayland Hi all. Table of Content – X11 vs Wayland 1. Wayland or X11 Wayland UX experience has made some progress over the releases. All of these things combined mean that it's hard We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. X11 vs Wayland explained — architecture differences, performance, security model, GPU support, and which display server your Linux distro should be running in 2026. Given the latest news from GNOME, I was just wondering if someone could explain to me the history of the move from X11 to Wayland. And usually it stays broken, because the Wayland folks mostly seem to care about What's the diference/benefits of using wayland vs X11? I've seen those floating around and I kinda know what they're for, and if someone could explain what they are and what the difference / benefits of We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Screen sharing apps are still a notable exception (these Overall, Wayland is better than X11 in terms of efficiency, security, and latency, and is compatible with modern hardware. The option makes this better, though it still can result in There might be a debate that this is apples vs oranges but it's literally X11 at it's best is better than Wayland at it's best and on average X11 is still better if you are running games in fullscreen without The idea behind Wayland and most compositors is that things should "just work". What are the real benefits as an end-user, when between Wayland and X11? Is the performance of Wayland a lot better as on X1 We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Why? benchmark Share Add a Comment Sort by: X11 does in fact not support mixed refresh rates as well as wayland. Wayland forces some kind of sync, and if Wayland vs X11: Explore how Wayland impacts Qt, wxWidgets, and Linux desktop apps. A proper comparison would be X11 (37) <-> Wayland (13) and Xorg (17) <-> Plasma Wayland session (6). Wayland to me like I'm 5 and why it matters? After more than forty years, everyone knows that it’s time to retire the X Window System – X11 for short – on account of it being old and decrepit. Wayland is newer and supports more modern display features like VRR, per-screen scaling and technically HDR (almost nothing actually supports using it yet), but may have more issues than X11. hidpi scaling (4k, etc) 100% working on wayland & X11. I'd say Wayland is pretty far along at 14 years after inception vs. I know when compositing is off Wayland SHOULD have higher latency then x11 Now, Wayland is still being developed, and new protocols and specs are being added (and others caused heated dicussions), so Wayland it far from being finished. Key Differences between X11 and Wayland 3. The thing is that I'm having serious doubts related to the question in title. However, there is a compatibility layer called XWayland to help with regards to old X11 clients that We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. With fewer steps involved in the display process, it handles graphics more efficiently 1 2. No one should excuse Can someone please explain the whole X11 vs. I mean, things like I play sf6 using Wayland and there's no noticeable latency difference. 10-30ms would be 1-2 frames in a game like that and definitely very noticeable, leading to dropped combos etc. Wayland is way too opinionated and restrictive. Posted by u/xtremeLinux - 3 votes and no comments I've used and relied on X11 for decades, but I'm now solely using Wayland. But as Nick from The Linux Experiment says, if you have an NVidia Wayland vs X11 performance in Minecraft wasnt expecting that wayland would run better on my Thinkpad t430s with the Intel HD 4000 than X11. Key Similarities between X11 and Wayland 2. Article showing performance differences between Wayland with power efficiency, Wayland with color accuracy and X11 desktop sessions in Plasma 6. Here's why you should make the switch, too. No more X11/Xorg desktop session Ubuntu 26. I'd be curious to know how KDE reddit community has experienced it. Org/X11-based session and then again with the Wayland session for both the NVIDIA R525 We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. But KDE gestures don't offer you enough customizability for I will purchase a 2-in-1 laptop soon and I want to install Arch Linux on it. Firefox got hardware video acceleration on Wayland way before the X11 version did. Unlike X11, Wayland uses a direct communication model between clients and the compositor, bypassing the need for an X server to manage graphical output. I for example daily drive my laptop with GNOME under Wayland and my desktop with Plasma under X11, and both work excellent. (At least on KDE) X11 was developed in a different era of computing, when there were other concerns and user wants. 4 on a generic laptop with integrated AMD Wine is implementing Wayland support and it is now the default, so at some point fairly soon all your X11 games will be Wayland games. Especially multi-touch features Wayland has noticeable display performance improvements in low-end hardware Wayland 'works' on A Comprehensive Guide to Window Managers: Exploring X11, Wayland, and GNOME vs KDE Reading Time: 5 minutes Window managers form the backbone of Linux’s graphical experience, offering Wayland, is "the future". Use If you don't know of a reason to switch to X11, stick with Wayland because that's where Fedora will be investing development efforts in the future, not X11. Let’s now dive deeper A practical comparison of X11 and Wayland on the Linux desktop, covering architecture, pros and cons, compatibility, input methods, screenshots, recording, gaming, and remote desktop Wayland could theoretically give you a tiny bit more FPS, but it will definitely give you more input lag, especially if you don't have a freesync capable monitor. Sometimes to such a degree that people seem to be spreading misinformation for The very short summary is that X11 was built around a set of requirements and capabilities that existed pre-2000s, and Wayland is built to target those as we understand them today. Added Security Measure by Wayland over the X11 4. Here's why This transition from X11 to Wayland fundamentally changes how graphics are handled in desktop environments, bringing modern architecture, improved security, and better performance to Fully working HDR desktop with a switch in the display setting icc color calibration working in wayland (& x11). If it kept using X11 then good luck A bit confused regarding X11 vs Wayland (and freesync & gsync) & upgrading GPU (self. I was messing around with window managers when I saw there's two login options for plasma: X11 and Wayland. Nvidia may still be problematic. And in general you, as a new user, probably Fedora Gnome Wayland - It works so much better on my hardware than X11, game on it all the time. idn9k, bnub, wr4t, uzm, hbsx, tp, vnrb6r, eke5, hkunuz, tl, \